Oppo Reno15 Pro Mini vs Samsung Galaxy S25 FE comparison
|
|
| Released at Jan, 2026 | Released at Sep, 2025 |
Pros
- Battery with a higher capacity
- Screen with a higher pixel density
- More performance in the AnTuTu test
- Larger display size
- More performance in the GeekBench test
Side-by-side comparison of the Oppo Reno15 Pro Mini and the Samsung Galaxy S25 FE. The key differences between them: 6.32" vs 6.7" display, 6200mAh vs 4900mAh battery, 12GB vs 8GB RAM and 187g vs 190g weight. Compare their full specifications, dimensions, cameras and benchmark results below to decide which one suits you better.
Size comparison
- Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
- Oppo Reno15 Pro Mini
Specifications comparison
General
| Models | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CPH2813 | SM-S731B / SM-S731B/DS | ||||||||
Software
| Operating System | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Android 16 | Android 16 | ||||||||
| Custom UI | |||||||||
| ColorOS 16 | One UI 8 | ||||||||
Body
| Dimensions | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 72.4 x 151.2 x 8mm | 76.6 x 161.3 x 7.4mm | ||||||||
| Weight | |||||||||
| 187g | 190g | ||||||||
| Materials | |||||||||
| Glass front (Gorilla Glass 7i), aluminum frame, glass back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus+), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus+), aluminum frame | ||||||||
| Resistance | |||||||||
| IP68/IP69 dust tight and water resistant (high pressure water jets; immersible up to 1.5m for 30 min) | IP68 dust tight and water resistant (immersible up to 1.5m for 30 min) | ||||||||
| Colours | |||||||||
| Dusk Brown (Cocoa Brown) / Aurora Blue / Glacier White / Crystal Pink | Icyblue / Jetblack / Navy / White | ||||||||
Display
| Size | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6.32" | 6.7" | ||||||||
| Type | |||||||||
| AMOLED | Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X | ||||||||
| Resolution | |||||||||
| 1216x2640 pixels | 1080x2340 pixels | ||||||||
| Density | |||||||||
| 460ppi | 385ppi | ||||||||
| Refresh rate | |||||||||
| 120Hz | 120Hz | ||||||||
| Protection | |||||||||
| Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+, Mohs level 5 | ||||||||
| Features | |||||||||
| 1B colors / HDR10+ / 600 nits (typ) / 1800 nits (HBM) | HDR10+ / 1900 nits (peak) | ||||||||
Camera
| Rear camera | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 200MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 0.5µm, PDAF, OIS / 50MP, f/2.8, 85mm (telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 3.5x optical zoom / 50MP, f/2.0, 16mm, 116˚ (ultrawide), AF | 50MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.57", 1.0µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS / 8MP, f/2.4, 75mm (telephoto), 1/4.4", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom / 12MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm | ||||||||
| Front camera | |||||||||
| 50MP, f/2.0, 18mm, 100˚ (ultrawide), AF | 12MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.2", 1.12µm | ||||||||
Processor
| Chipset | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mediatek Dimensity 8450 (4 nm) | Exynos 2400 (4 nm) | ||||||||
| CPU | |||||||||
| Octa-core (1x3.25 GHz Cortex-A725 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A725 & 4x2.1 GHz Cortex-A725) | 10-core (1x3.2GHz Cortex-X4 & 2x2.9GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.6GHz Cortex-A720 & 4x1.95GHz Cortex-A520) | ||||||||
| GPU | |||||||||
| Mali-G720 MC7 | Xclipse 940 | ||||||||
Memory
| RAM size | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12GB | 8GB | ||||||||
Storage
| Internal storage | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 256 / 512GB | 128 / 256 / 512GB | ||||||||
| Storage type | |||||||||
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.0 | ||||||||
| Card slot | |||||||||
| - | - | ||||||||
Connectivity
| Number of SIMs | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 1 | ||||||||
| SIM type | |||||||||
| Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM / eSIM | ||||||||
| Cellular technology | |||||||||
| GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | ||||||||
| Wi-Fi | |||||||||
| a / b / g / n / ac / 6 | a / b / g / n / ac / 6e | ||||||||
| Bluetooth | |||||||||
| 5.4 | 5.4 | ||||||||
| NFC | |||||||||
| + | + | ||||||||
| Navigation | |||||||||
| GPS / GLONASS / BDS / GALILEO / QZSS | GPS / GLONASS / BDS / GALILEO | ||||||||
| USB | |||||||||
| USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG | ||||||||
Audio
Sensors
| Fingerprint sensor | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| + | + | ||||||||
| Accelerometer | |||||||||
| + | + | ||||||||
| Barometer | |||||||||
| + | |||||||||
| Gyro sensor | |||||||||
| + | + | ||||||||
| Geomagnetic sensor | |||||||||
| + | + | ||||||||
| Proximity sensor | |||||||||
| + | + | ||||||||
Battery
| Capacity | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6200mAh | 4900mAh | ||||||||
| Fast charging | |||||||||
| + | + | ||||||||
| Wireless charging | |||||||||
| + | |||||||||
| Reverse wireless charging | |||||||||
| + | |||||||||
Performance
| AnTuTu | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1605644 (v10) | 1521140 (v10) | ||||||||
| GeekBench | |||||||||
| 6201 (v6) | 6948 (v6) | ||||||||
FAQ
What is the difference between the Reno15 Pro Mini and the Galaxy S25 FE?
The main differences are: 6.32" vs 6.7" display, 6200mAh vs 4900mAh battery, 12GB vs 8GB RAM and 187g vs 190g weight. See the full specifications comparison below.
Which has a bigger battery, the Reno15 Pro Mini or the Galaxy S25 FE?
The Reno15 Pro Mini has the bigger battery: 6200mAh vs 4900mAh.
Which has a larger display, the Reno15 Pro Mini or the Galaxy S25 FE?
The Galaxy S25 FE has the larger display: 6.7" vs 6.32".
Which has more RAM, the Reno15 Pro Mini or the Galaxy S25 FE?
The Reno15 Pro Mini has more RAM: 12GB vs 8GB.
Which is lighter, the Reno15 Pro Mini or the Galaxy S25 FE?
The Reno15 Pro Mini is lighter: 187g vs 190g.
Which is faster, the Reno15 Pro Mini or the Galaxy S25 FE?
The Reno15 Pro Mini scores higher in the AnTuTu benchmark: 1605644 (v10) vs 1521140 (v10).