Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 4 comparison
|
|
| Released at Sep, 2021 | Released at Aug, 2022 |
Pros
- Thiner
- Less weight
- Screen with a higher pixel density
- More performance in the GeekBench test
- Larger display size
- More performance in the AnTuTu test
Side-by-side comparison of the Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 4. The key differences between them: 6.7" vs 7.6" display, 4352mAh vs 4400mAh battery, 6GB vs 12GB RAM and 240g vs 263g weight. Compare their full specifications, dimensions, cameras and benchmark results below to decide which one suits you better.
Size comparison
- Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
- Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 4
Specifications comparison
General
| Models | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A2643 / A2484 / A2641 / A2644 / A2645 / iphone14,3 | SM-F936B / SM-F936B/DS / SM-F936U / SM-F936U1 / SM-F936N / SM-F936W | ||||||||
| In the Box | |||||||||
| USB‑C to Lightning Cable, Documentation | Data cable Type C-Type C; Quick user guide; Pin for removing the SIM card; Film on the main screen | ||||||||
Software
| Operating System | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| iOS 15 | Android 12L | ||||||||
| Custom UI | |||||||||
| One UI 4.1.1 | |||||||||
Body
| Dimensions | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 78.1 x 160.8 x 7.7mm | 67.1 x 155.1 x 15.8mm | ||||||||
| Weight | |||||||||
| 240g | 263g | ||||||||
| Materials | |||||||||
| Glass front (Gorilla Glass), glass back (Gorilla Glass), stainless steel frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus+) (folded), plastic front (unfolded), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus+), aluminum frame | ||||||||
| Resistance | |||||||||
| IPX8 water resistant, Gorilla Glass Victus+ | |||||||||
| Colours | |||||||||
| Graphite / Gold / Silver / Sierra Blue / Alpine Green | Graygreen / Phantom Black / Beige / Burgundy | ||||||||
Display
| Size | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6.7" | 7.6" | ||||||||
| Type | |||||||||
| Super Retina XDR OLED | Foldable Dynamic AMOLED 2X | ||||||||
| Resolution | |||||||||
| 1284x2778 pixels | 1812x2176 pixels | ||||||||
| Density | |||||||||
| 458ppi | 373ppi | ||||||||
| Refresh rate | |||||||||
| 120Hz | 120Hz | ||||||||
| Protection | |||||||||
| Scratch-resistant ceramic glass, oleophobic coating | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ | ||||||||
| Features | |||||||||
| HDR10+ / Foldable | |||||||||
Camera
| Rear camera | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12MP, f/1.5, 26mm (wide), 1.9µm, dual pixel PDAF, sensor-shift OIS / 12MP, f/2.8, 77mm (telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom / 12MP, f/1.8, 13mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), PDAF | 50MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1.0µm, Dual Pixel PDAF, OIS / 10MP, f/2.4, 66mm (telephoto), 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom / 12MP, f/2.2, 123˚, 12mm (ultrawide), 1.12µm | ||||||||
| Front camera | |||||||||
| 12MP, f/2.2, 23mm (wide), 1/3.6" | 4MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 2.0µm, under display | ||||||||
Processor
| Chipset | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 | ||||||||
| CPU | |||||||||
| Hexa-core (2x3.23 GHz Avalanche + 4x1.82 GHz Blizzard) | Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | ||||||||
| GPU | |||||||||
| Apple GPU (5-core graphics) | Adreno 730 | ||||||||
Memory
| RAM size | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6GB | 12GB | ||||||||
| RAM type | |||||||||
| LPDDR5 | |||||||||
Storage
| Internal storage | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 128 / 256 / 512GB | 256 / 512 / 1024GB | ||||||||
| Storage type | |||||||||
| UFS 3.1 | |||||||||
| Card slot | |||||||||
| - | - | ||||||||
Connectivity
| Number of SIMs | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 2 | ||||||||
| SIM type | |||||||||
| Nano-SIM / eSIM | Nano-SIM | ||||||||
| Cellular technology | |||||||||
| GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | ||||||||
| Wi-Fi | |||||||||
| a / b / g / n / ac / 6 | a / b / g / n / ac / 6e | ||||||||
| Bluetooth | |||||||||
| 5.0 | 5.2 | ||||||||
| NFC | |||||||||
| + | + | ||||||||
| Navigation | |||||||||
| GPS / GLONASS / BDS / GALILEO | GPS / GLONASS / GALILEO / BDS | ||||||||
| USB | |||||||||
| Lightning, USB 2.0 | Type-C 3.2 | ||||||||
Audio
Sensors
| Fingerprint sensor | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | + | ||||||||
| Face ID | |||||||||
| + | - | ||||||||
| Accelerometer | |||||||||
| + | + | ||||||||
| Barometer | |||||||||
| + | + | ||||||||
| Gyro sensor | |||||||||
| + | + | ||||||||
| Geomagnetic sensor | |||||||||
| + | + | ||||||||
| Hall sensor | |||||||||
| - | - | ||||||||
| Proximity sensor | |||||||||
| + | + | ||||||||
| Ambient Light sensor | |||||||||
| - | - | ||||||||
Battery
| Capacity | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4352mAh | 4400mAh | ||||||||
| Type | |||||||||
| Li-Ion | Li-Po | ||||||||
| Fast charging | |||||||||
| + | + | ||||||||
| Wireless charging | |||||||||
| + | + | ||||||||
| Reverse wireless charging | |||||||||
| - | + | ||||||||
Performance
| AnTuTu | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 801691 (v9) | 1015149 (v9) | ||||||||
| GeekBench | |||||||||
| 4706 (v5.1) | 3845 (v5) | ||||||||
FAQ
What is the difference between the iPhone 13 Pro Max and the Galaxy Z Fold 4?
The main differences are: 6.7" vs 7.6" display, 4352mAh vs 4400mAh battery, 6GB vs 12GB RAM and 240g vs 263g weight. See the full specifications comparison below.
Which has a bigger battery, the iPhone 13 Pro Max or the Galaxy Z Fold 4?
The Galaxy Z Fold 4 has the bigger battery: 4400mAh vs 4352mAh.
Which has a larger display, the iPhone 13 Pro Max or the Galaxy Z Fold 4?
The Galaxy Z Fold 4 has the larger display: 7.6" vs 6.7".
Which has more RAM, the iPhone 13 Pro Max or the Galaxy Z Fold 4?
The Galaxy Z Fold 4 has more RAM: 12GB vs 6GB.
Which is lighter, the iPhone 13 Pro Max or the Galaxy Z Fold 4?
The iPhone 13 Pro Max is lighter: 240g vs 263g.
Which is faster, the iPhone 13 Pro Max or the Galaxy Z Fold 4?
The Galaxy Z Fold 4 scores higher in the AnTuTu benchmark: 1015149 (v9) vs 801691 (v9).